.svg)
In the energy and infrastructure sectors, regulatory change is the only constant. Federal standards under NEPA, the Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act are ever-evolving, while state and local requirements layer on complexity. One misstep, whether at the federal level or in a county permit, can halt projects, trigger substantial fines, or spark citizen-led lawsuits. At The Planet Group, we understand that staffing about more than just filling seats. It’s about forging a resilient compliance infrastructure across jurisdictions.
A Changing EPA & Enforcement Strategy
In May 2025, the National Environmental Policy Act’s (NEPA) scope was significantly narrowed when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal agencies may limit environmental reviews to direct project impacts under NEPA. This excludes indirect downstream consequences like Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuels transported via permitted infrastructure. This ruling has reduced regulatory drag—making permitting faster.
Simultaneously, a directive issued in March redefined enforcement priorities. It calls for prioritizing imminent health hazards and egregious pollution incidents. Lesser violations, under this new paradigm, are less likely to draw EPA resources.
Together, these developments create an enforcement landscape that is more selective—and paradoxically, potentially more dangerous for organizations that get caught off guard.
Why Compliance Risk Is Greater, Not Smaller
When enforcement becomes less frequent, violations may go undetected for years. Then, during a targeted audit, organizations may face retroactive penalties and remediation orders spanning long periods of non-compliance.
The EPA’s shift to prioritize major violations means that when inspectors do arrive, they’re focused on areas where business failure is most visible and consequential. That elevates both the stakes and scrutiny compared to frequent, lower-risk inspections of the past.
Adding to the complexity, reduced federal enforcement has created a vacuum often filled by states and citizen litigants. Statutes allowing private parties to sue over environmental infractions have gained traction; enforcement no longer rests solely in EPA’s hands. Those sued via citizen suits may face public injunctions and reputational damage—regardless of federal activity.
Finally, digital transparency tools like EPA’s ECHO database amplify exposure. Even minor compliance issues, once reported, become accessible to investors, NGOs, and the public—magnifying reputational risk.
Building Compliance Resilience Across Jurisdictions
To thrive in today’s fragmented regulatory environment, energy and infrastructure organizations must build multi-layered compliance capability that spans federal, state, and local oversight. What follows are some key strategies to strengthen resilience and reduce regulatory risk, even as enforcement standards shift.
Screen for Jurisdictional Expertise
Environmental compliance is rarely uniform. Roles require highly specific knowledge depending on the region, project type, and regulatory body involved. Organizations should go beyond resume-level vetting and assess candidates based on practical experience. For example, has a NEPA specialist worked on both federal and local reviews, including Army Corps permitting and municipal stormwater plans? Does a wastewater compliance lead understand both Clean Water Act NPDES permits and state-specific water-quality standards?
To get this right, companies may benefit from partnering with a staffing firm that can evaluate past project experience, not just credentials.
Build On-the-Ground Competence
Ensuring compliance at the project level requires hiring field professionals with local permitting fluency, such as knowledge of county erosion standards, air district rules, and local biodiversity setbacks.
Look for candidates who can engage local stakeholders, environmental justice advocates, or tribal nations early in the process. These professionals don’t just check boxes—they help raise the overall vigilance and visibility of the compliance function from day one.
Embed Training and Peer Collaboration
Environmental rules evolve rapidly. Whether it's Clean Air Act updates, EPA guidance changes, or shifts in regional enforcement priorities, compliance professionals need ongoing development. Organizations can strengthen readiness by:
- Offering regulatory refresher programs tailored to the specific regulatory domains their teams operate in (air, water, waste, cybersecurity).
- Hosting site-specific workshops on procedural updates or best practices in environmental health and safety.
- Facilitating peer-to-peer networks across projects or regions, allowing staff to share site-specific lessons, regulatory pitfalls, or emerging tech like CMMS-enabled monitoring systems.
This peer-driven knowledge exchange creates a culture of proactive learning and adaptability—critical in a climate where yesterday’s rulebooks may be outdated tomorrow.
Leverage Digital Monitoring and Audit Systems
Compliance today is about integrated systems, not stacks of paperwork. Organizations that embed environmental monitoring tools—such as CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management Systems), EAM (Enterprise Asset Management), or automated compliance trackers—can flag potential issues before they become violations.
Hiring staff who are not only familiar with these systems but can deploy and interpret them adds a significant advantage. These professionals help align operations with best practices (like EPA’s voluntary audit policy) and provide digital audit trails that can de-risk inspections or enforcement actions.
Navigate Federal, State, and Local Oversight
Knowing which regulatory authority matters—and when—is a core compliance skill. Laws like NEPA or the Clean Water Act are influenced by federal court rulings, but implementation often occurs at the state or municipal level. Organizations should prioritize staff who understand how to:
- Interpret evolving definitions
- Track state-specific air or waste rule updates
- Align internal procedures with overlapping jurisdictional demands
Professionals who serve as effective translators between agencies and job sites are essential to preventing disconnects that lead to delays or fines.
Meeting Risk with Readiness
Regulatory loosening at the federal level does not mean fewer compliance challenges—it means higher risk exposure when violations are discovered. But smart, strategic staffing can turn this challenge into an operational edge.
At The Planet Group, we curate compliance capacity that's proactive, jurisdictionally fluent, and audit-ready. Want to build a team that keeps your projects advancing—confidently—no matter which agency steps in next? Contact us today, and let’s create your compliance backbone together.
